December 6, 2009

Getting to know you...

By Alison Loat

Before Samara started our MP exit interviews, we spent a good chunk of the summer researching the backgrounds of the 139 former MPs that left public life during the 38th and 39th Parliaments.

The team read whatever it could on these folks, including CBC riding profiles, and biographical sketches from Library of Parliament, Wikipedia and, where available, from the MPs' own websites.Where possible, we also read supplementary articles on each of our MPs and the issues they were involved with.

So yes, by the time we started our interviews, we were prepared – and we had also learned a great deal of unexpected and surprising information about who these Canadian MPs are (as a group) and how they compared to the average Canadian.

For example, available information reveals that at least 76% of the former MPs in our group are married or in a common-law relationship, versus 59% of Canadian adults.A small and perhaps random tidbit, but one that takes on a great deal more significance as our interviews reveal how much personal and family factors influence one's experience in public life.

This background research will also allow us to organize our results in a way that allows us to compare across a wide number of factors, including the age at which they were elected, their profession before politics, their gender, their place of birth as well as their home riding and political party.

All of which to say, there will be many more stories like this. Most Mondays we'll post a factoid or two in the hopes it helps you learn just a bit more about political leadership in Canada.

LABELS: ,

Comments (2) Permanent link to this post

Comments

Comments

Alison

March 5, 2010 20:45 PM

Thanks for the comment Benjo.  It's probably tough to infer too much from the statistic beyond what it is, although it is true that politics is a demanding profession so a supportive spouse is extremely important to most.

Benjo

March 5, 2010 20:45 PM

These are interesting findings, particularly the statistic regarding the MPs' marital statuses. Does this mean that politicians who are not in a committed relationship appear less reliable and trustworthy? Relationships denote a level of trust and commitment, as well as identify strength and endurance. It's possible that this stereotype is disengaging voters, particularly younger ones, who place less of an emphasis on this characteristic. Furthermore, this finding assumes that committed relationships may be an 'ideal type' for the average politician. No wonder the emphasis on outing closeted politicians is an issue...

Add comment




biuquote
Loading